README

The AI tool-execution runtime for the Milpa PHP framework, built on milpa/core. It runs the loop every Milpa module declares: plugin → capability → tool → verification → event → result. #[Tool]-attributed methods become a registry pipeline — resolve, validate, authorize, execute, audit — with policy gates, rate limiting, channel-aware rendering, and human/agent verification as first-class seams.

milpa/tool-runtime is where milpa/core's agent-tool-readiness seam becomes a working engine. Milpa\Interfaces\Tooling\ToolProviderInterface and ToolRegistryInterface are contracts defined in core; this package is the concrete ToolRegistry that resolves, validates, authorizes, executes, and audits every call, plus the #[Tool] attribute that lets a plain PHP method declare itself as agent-callable. No Doctrine, no HTTP kernel, no concrete policy storage — those live in your host application.

Install

composer require milpa/tool-runtime

Quick example

Attribute a method with #[Tool]; parameters describe themselves with #[Param]:

use Milpa\ToolRuntime\Attributes\Param;
use Milpa\ToolRuntime\Attributes\Tool;
use Milpa\ToolRuntime\ToolResult;

final class NoteTools
{
    #[Tool('list_notes', 'List saved notes', scopes: ['notes:read'])]
    public function listNotes(
        #[Param('Page number', clamp: [1, 1000])] int $page = 1
    ): ToolResult {
        return ToolResult::success(['notes' => [], 'page' => $page]);
    }
}

ToolScanner reflects the class for #[Tool] methods and registers them; ToolRegistry runs the full pipeline on every call:

use Milpa\ToolRuntime\Contracts\ToolContext;
use Milpa\ToolRuntime\ToolRegistry;
use Milpa\ToolRuntime\ToolScanner;
use Psr\Log\NullLogger;

$registry = new ToolRegistry(new NullLogger());
(new ToolScanner($registry))->scan(new NoteTools());

$result = $registry->call('list_notes', ['page' => 1], ToolContext::cli());

$result->success;  // true
$result->data;     // ['notes' => [], 'page' => 1]
$result->toJson();  // {"success":true,"data":{...},"message":null,"error":null,"meta":{...}}

No ToolContext is required — call() defaults to ToolContext::cli() (full-access, for scripts and tests). Real hosts build one per channel: ToolContext::mcp($requestId, $principal, $scopes), ToolContext::telegram($chatId, $userId), or a custom new ToolContext(...) for a web session.

The pipeline

Every ToolRegistry::call() runs the same six steps, in order, regardless of who is calling — a human over cli, an LLM over mcp, or a bot over telegram:

1. Resolve — look up the tool by name; an unknown name is a typed ToolResult::error() (ToolResult::TOOL_NOT_FOUND), never an exception.
2. Validate — SchemaValidator checks the arguments against the tool's JSON input schema (required fields, types), then applies numeric clamps before execution.
3. Authorize — PolicyGate checks the caller's ToolContext scopes against the tool's required scopes, then falls back to per-channel policy (cli allows all, mcp and web require auth by default). A host can plug in PolicyRuleProviderInterface for database-backed rules, and an optional RateLimiterInterface throttles by channel:principal:tool.
4. Confirm (mutating tools only) — a tool declared confirm: true (or matching a channel's require_confirmation_for_mutating policy) returns a confirm_token on the first call instead of executing; the caller replays the same arguments plus that token to proceed. ConfirmationTokenStore holds the pending action and its expiry.
5. Execute — the tool's callback runs with a soft timeout; a bare return value is wrapped in ToolResult::success() automatically, and an uncaught Throwable becomes ToolResult::error() (ToolResult::INTERNAL_ERROR) instead of propagating.
6. Audit — ToolAuditLogger records every call (success, failure, or rejection) via PSR-3, redacting sensitive argument fields (password, token, secret, …) before they ever reach a log line.

A ToolContext built with mode: 'plan' (or ToolContext::asPlan()) short-circuits after step 3: it validates and authorizes but never executes, returning the would-be plan instead — a dry-run for any tool, for free.

Verification: human_verify

Some actions can't be authorized by scopes alone — they need a human or another agent to say yes. milpa/core defines the seam: Milpa\Interfaces\Verification\VerifierInterface, whose verify() returns a VerificationResult that may be PENDING and resolve later. This package ships the reference implementation:

• HumanVerifier implements VerifierInterface. verify() cannot decide synchronously, so it returns VerificationResult::pending() and dispatches verification.requested; a later grant() / reject() call resolves it and dispatches verification.granted / verification.rejected.
• HumanVerifyTool exposes HumanVerifier as the human_verify tool — the same registry pipeline every other tool runs through, no special-cased transport. Its register() marks it ToolOptions(mutating: true, requiresConfirmation: true), so any call through ToolRegistry::call() — whether it's a request or a resolve — hits the registry's own step-4 confirmation gate (see The pipeline) before HumanVerifyTool::handle() ever runs.

Through the registry: the generic confirm-token dance

Calling human_verify via $registry->call() behaves exactly like any other requiresConfirmation tool: the first call does not run handle(). It mints a confirm_token and returns the registry's generic wrapper instead — no request_id anywhere, because this wrapper is generic and knows nothing about HumanVerifier:

use Milpa\ToolRuntime\Verification\HumanVerifier;
use Milpa\ToolRuntime\Verification\HumanVerifyTool;

(new HumanVerifyTool(new HumanVerifier()))->register($registry);

$registry->call('human_verify', [
    'subject' => 'gate:report.publish',
    'decision' => 'grant',
    'principal' => 'agent:claude',
    'request_id' => 'req-123',
], $ctx);
// -> ToolResult success, data: [
//      'requires_confirmation' => true,
//      'confirm_token' => '7e01bf71...',
//      'action_summary' => 'human_verify(subject=gate:report.publish, decision=grant, principal=agent:claude)',
//      'expires_at' => '2026-07-07T02:16:26+00:00',
//    ]
// handle() has NOT run — HumanVerifier::grant() has not been called yet.

$registry->call('human_verify', [
    'subject' => 'gate:report.publish',
    'decision' => 'grant',
    'principal' => 'agent:claude',
    'request_id' => 'req-123',
    'confirm_token' => '7e01bf71...',   // from the previous response
], $ctx);
// -> ToolResult success, data: [
//      'status' => 'passed', 'reason' => null, 'verifier' => 'human_verify',
//      'principal' => 'agent:claude', 'missing' => [], 'metadata' => [],
//    ]
// NOW handle() ran, using the exact args ConfirmationTokenStore stored at create() time
// (not whatever you pass on the second call) — this is what actually invoked HumanVerifier::grant().

The second call must replay the same arguments as the first, plus confirm_token; ConfirmationTokenStore::consume() hands ToolRegistry::call() back the args it stored, and those — not the ones on the redeeming call — are what handle() receives.

⚠️ Calling human_verify through the registry without a decision (to open a request) hits the same gate: the first call only returns a confirm_token, and redeeming it invokes handle() with no decision, which — being HumanVerifyTool's own request phase — returns another confirmation, this one carrying request_id. Resolving that request then needs a second confirm-token round trip (this time with decision in the args) — four registry calls end-to-end. For the two-phase request_id flow HumanVerifyTool was built around, skip the registry and call the tool directly — see below.

Direct usage: the two-phase request_id flow

HumanVerifyTool's request → resolve round trip (open a request, get a request_id, resolve it later with that id) is reached by calling handle() directly — this is how the package's own tests exercise it (tests/Unit/Verification/HumanVerifyToolTest.php), and it's the sanctioned way to drive D8 verification programmatically, independent of the registry's confirmation gate:

use Milpa\ToolRuntime\Verification\HumanVerifier;
use Milpa\ToolRuntime\Verification\HumanVerifyTool;

$tool = new HumanVerifyTool(new HumanVerifier($eventDispatcher));

$request = $tool->handle(['subject' => 'gate:report.publish']);
// -> ToolResult::confirmation(), $request->data['request_id'] === '06a1dda5-...'
// HumanVerifier::verify() ran and dispatched `verification.requested`.

$tool->handle([
    'subject' => 'gate:report.publish',
    'decision' => 'grant',
    'principal' => 'agent:claude',
    'request_id' => $request->data['request_id'],
]);
// -> ToolResult::success(), data: ['status' => 'passed', 'principal' => 'agent:claude', ...]
// HumanVerifier::grant() ran and dispatched `verification.granted`.

Any other VerifierInterface implementation — a deterministic rule, a quorum vote, an external approval service — plugs into the same seam.

What lives where

API de facto

The types you construct and pass around day to day:

Requirements

• PHP ≥ 8.3
• milpa/core ^0.2
• psr/log ^3

Contributing

Contributions are welcome — see CONTRIBUTING.md. Please report security issues via SECURITY.md, and note that this project follows a Code of Conduct.

License

Apache-2.0 © the Milpa authors.

Milpa is designed, built, and maintained by TeamX Agency.